Shallow Signifyin Guyana Coughs Up Lame Arguments
The United States based Afro-Guyanese Charmaine Valere (we’re not sure if she will merely loathe or outright despise us for such a classification but we are striving to find out) has responded to our response to her.
It would appear as though she is making three main points and a couple other secondary ones in what must be described as a shallow and rather pathetic response from someone we thought was of a superior intellectual capacity. We will respond to each of the points individually.
Signifyin Guyana: “The hyphenated term ‘Afro-somebody of African descent living outside of Africa’ is no longer used by the people who first coined it. These days (hello enlightenment!) they, and most other people of African descent around the world prefer an identification term that reflects more than a hairstyle.”
So because the term is no longer used by others us Guyanese should follow pattern and do as they do. Right, that is all us Guyanese are good for in the minds of these overseas-based self-righteous guardians of all things right and good. We must merely be followers of the rest of the world. When they jump off the cliff, we must also jump off the cliff, because if they do it, it must be right. Why would we want to bother to engage our brain and think for ourselves? This is the very basis of dehumanization and slavery which Charmaine clearly wishes to resuscitate at least in a psychological if not physical sense.
Nevertheless we had already addressed this in our original post and we repeat it because clearly the Afro-Guyanese ma’am Charmaine missed it the first time round.
Living Guyana: "Of course it may very well be a case of Charmaine and similar thinkers just wanting to be 'follow pattern' behind the Americans as they previously used Afro-American which has now evolved into 'African American'. So because the Americans are doing it they, with their 'mimic men attitudes' are probably of the persuasion that we too should follow because of course Guyanese MUST do everything like the great Americans do."
Just as we thought, they think us Guyanese ast stupid backwater types who are not worthy of being independent thinkers so they must think for us and dictate our affairs because they send a lil freck every now and then and because they live in heaven and we live in a sticking hell hole.
She is also suggesting that the term Afro-Guyanese is derived from the popular retro hairstyle ‘the Afro’. What is this woman smoking?
The term Afro-Guyanese (and Afro-Trinidadian where it is still widely used and where ‘African Trinidadian’ is virtually NEVER used) has been in existence long before the Afro became a fashion fad in the 1960s. Afro-Guyanese preceded the hairstyle and to say otherwise is to perpetuate a fallacy.
Charmaine is yet to proffer a sensible and logical argument as to why the term ‘Afro’ is derogatory and ignorant’.
Signifyin Guyana: “...names are an integral part of the development of any group's identity and upliftment.”
We disagree. Names are a part of the development of any group identity. We notice how she is deceptively trying to sneak in the word “upliftment” there without any supporting evidence. Secondly we recognise names as ‘a part’ of a group’s identity, not ‘an integral part’. This again is another fallacy which is being mainly foisted upon blacks and perpetuated, especially in Afro-America by the purveyors of black power organizations.
If names were indeed as integral as Charmaine would have us believe then the millions of Afro-Caribbean men and women who carry around Anglo-Saxon names should all be walking around like headless zombies as they are not carrying names which truly identify with their roots and who they truly are but are carrying the names, in many instances of their very slave owners and former masters. As they are carrying names which are truly false they are thus identity-less and downtrodden. What about a name like Charmaine? And Valere? Perhaps it is her very name which has poor Charmaine as confused and bazoodee as she clearly is from the lack of substance in her non-arguments.
Signifyin Guyana: “Living Guyana's insistence on pointing out the hopeless antagonistic relationship between people of Indian and African descent in Guyana is not uplifting in any way...”
Whenever did we say we are pointing a finger at the reality of serious ethnic divisions in Guyana in order to bring about upliftment? That is not our business at this juncture. We have said before that we are highlighting the issue of real and entrenched racism in Guyana in order to illustrate that it is a real problem as there are persons going around who are preaching that Guyana does not have race problems. We think this is a lie and it is our intention to expose that lie.
Signifyin Guyana: "Maybe if they (Living Guyana) spent some time figuring out and writing about the real reasons behind the animosities, they'll see that the 28 years of PNC rule may not be the whole story. It can't hurt to dig into the way people really see each other's differences."
Whenever did we posit that the ‘28 years’ was the whole story? We urge her to go back and read this very carefully and very slowly and understand it for what it is. That, Charmaine, is clearly described as PART ONE. Do you understand that Part One means that there are more parts to follow and hence a clear indication that there is more to the story? We hope you visit your optometrist soon enough.
Signifyin Guyana: “Living Guyana has a legitimate space to start a serious discourse on ethnic issues in Guyana. Maybe they should spend some time doing that rather than trying to slam my rass.”
Long before Charmaine started to preach about what Living Guyana should and should not do (and how arrogant for her to seek to dictate our actions and directions) we have been engaged in blogging our frank thoughts on ethnic issues.
Clearly Charmaine is boxing out of her division in this discussion as we have demonstrated above with her many fallacies and inaccuracies and plain old bullshit. She should confine herself to her little cocoon of critiquing literary work which she is at least fairly competent at.
We cannot spend our energies debating serious issues with persons of shallow intellectual make ups who refuse to get out of the mud and discuss major critical issues as opposed to petty non-issues. Don’t come swimming in the ocean darling when yuh drowning inna de gutta wid de lil fish dem. Yuh nah ready fuh dis ya league yet darlin. Gwaan go read some books, inform yourself, broaden your knowledge base and come back to us in a few years time. Til then, hush yuh mouth and stay in yuh karna and listen big people talk.

